Agentic AI
Agents that plan, call tools, and hand work back to people.
- Multi-agent orchestration
- Tool use & MCP
- Human-in-the-loop
- Guardrails
- Workflow automation
AI-native software engineering
We build agents, voice, and retrieval systems — and the full-stack software, data pipelines and infrastructure they run on.
Working across US, EU and GCC time zones · Response within 24 hours
Most AI projects die between the demo and the deploy. We build the other half — the evaluation suites, the guardrails, the latency and cost budgets, the observability and the boring infrastructure that turns a convincing prototype into a system your customers can rely on.
How we workCapabilities
The AI systems on top, and the product, data and infrastructure they run on. One team for both, because the second half is usually what decides whether the first one ships.
Agents that plan, call tools, and hand work back to people.
LLM features that hold up under real inputs.
Chat and phone agents that hold a real conversation.
Answers grounded in your data, with citations.
Web and mobile products, built to be maintained.
The services everything else depends on.
Pipelines that make the AI worth having.
Ship it, run it, keep it cheap.
Also:ML & computer visionMobile engineeringAI strategy & enablementDesign & product discoveryCreative & growth engineeringAll 13 services
Algologix Labs · our own products
Building and operating our own products keeps us honest about what happens after launch — the on-call, the cost curve, the model deprecations, the edge cases real users find in week two.
Launch AI voice and web agents on your own number.
Relay is in build. Leave your email and we'll tell you before it opens — that is the only thing we'll use it for.
Selected work
Three projects, written at sector level. Each one names what was actually measured — because the interesting part of an AI project is never the demo, it is whether the numbers held once real users arrived.
A retrieval assistant over clinical policy and procedure documents, answering staff questions with span-level citations and refusing to answer when the documents do not support one.
A document-extraction pipeline for a retail group, classifying and extracting structured records from supplier invoices and delivery notes arriving in every format a supplier felt like using.
An inbound voice agent for a freight operator, handling status enquiries and booking amendments outside staffed hours, with a clean handover into the morning queue.
Some of our work is under NDA. We are happy to walk through it on a call.
All workHow we work
The same process on every engagement, whether it runs six weeks or six months. Each stage ends in something you can hold — a document, a prototype, a running system — so you always know what you have bought.
Frame the outcome, audit data and systems, spike the risky part, size it.
Flows, interface, system and data architecture, agent and model design; prototype the riskiest path first.
One-to-two week slices, CI from day one, instrumented as it is built, demo every sprint.
Eval suites, red-teaming, guardrails, latency and cost budgets, load, accessibility and security review.
Deploy, monitor, iterate on real usage, transfer knowledge.
Most agencies stop at 03. The gap between a demo that impresses and a system that survives is stage 04.
Technology
Chosen per problem, not per fashion. Here's what's in the toolbox.
A grounded agent, wired the way we wire them — retrieve, cite, answer, or decline.
"""A grounded support agent: retrieve, cite, or decline."""
from anthropic import Anthropic
client = Anthropic()
search_policies = {
"name": "search_policies",
"description": "Find policy passages answering a question.",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {"query": {"type": "string"}},
"required": ["query"],
},
}
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-opus-5",
max_tokens=1024,
system=(
"Answer only from retrieved policy, and cite the "
"passage id. If nothing matches, say so."
),
tools=[search_policies],
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": question}],
)Those three numbers are this page, measured on 4 September 2026 — not a client's system. We publish our own before we ask you to trust anyone else's.
Engineering standards
Not adjectives. Six things we do on every engagement, each one specific enough that you can hold us to it in a review.
Every AI feature ships with a test set, a scoring method and a regression gate.
We set a p95 and a cost-per-run target in Discover, and hold the build to it.
Tracing, structured logs and dashboards from the first sprint, not bolted on after an incident.
Your repo, your cloud accounts, your model weights, your prompts. No lock-in, no rented black box.
Secrets management, least privilege, dependency scanning, PII handling and provider DPAs from day one.
Architecture docs, runbooks and a walkthrough. Your team can run it without us — that's the point.
How to start
Most engagements begin with the smallest one that answers the open question. You can move between them, and we will tell you when a smaller one would do.
2–3 weeks · Fixed scope, fixed price
Best for: Is this even feasible?
6–16 weeks · Milestone-based
Best for: Idea → launched product
Monthly, rolling · Monthly, rolling
Best for: An ongoing roadmap, embedded with your team
Monthly retainer · Monthly retainer
Best for: It's live and it must stay live
Fixed price where the scope is fixed. Time and materials where the discovery is real. We tell you which one applies before you sign, and we don't do change-order surprises.
In their words
The part that matters is usually what happened after launch, so that is what we ask clients to write about.
They shipped a working voice agent in three weeks and then spent another two making it survive our actual call volume. The second part is the part nobody else offered.
We came in with a chatbot idea and left with a retrieval architecture that actually cites its sources. They talked us out of the more expensive option twice.
Clear scope, weekly demos, no surprises on the invoice. The handover documentation was better than what our internal team writes.
They set a latency and cost budget in week one and held the build to it. Our per-conversation cost came in under the estimate.
Insights
How we evaluate agents, the retrieval architecture we default to, and what an AI feature actually costs to run.
The methodology, the metrics we score, and where the latency budget actually goes.
4 min read
The actual pipeline — chunking, hybrid retrieval, reranking and span-level attribution — with the trade-offs named.
4 min read
Token, inference and infrastructure maths, with a worked example you can put your own numbers into.
3 min read
Questions
The seven we are asked most often, answered properly rather than deflected to a call.
AI systems that have to run in production — agents, copilots, retrieval over your own data, voice and chat agents, computer vision — and the product and platform engineering around them. If the work is an AI feature inside a real product, that is the middle of what we do. If it is a research question with no deployment at the end of it, we are the wrong team and we will say so on the first call.
Either. Most engagements start at Discover, where we frame the outcome, audit the data and spike the part most likely to fail — and end with a deployed system and a documented handover. If you already have a specification and a design, we can start at Engineer instead. What we will not do is build to a spec we think is wrong without telling you first.
Often, and it is usually the better arrangement. A Dedicated Pod embeds with your team in your repo, your tools and your ceremonies. On a Product Build we run our own cadence and review into yours. Either way your engineers are in the pull requests from the first sprint, because a handover at the end to people who have never seen the code is not a handover.
No, we do not train on your data, and neither do the providers we configure — enterprise API terms exclude it, and we set that up rather than assume it. Data stays in your accounts and your region wherever the architecture allows. We apply PII detection and redaction before a payload leaves your boundary, keep provider DPAs on file, and write down exactly which data reaches which provider before anything is built.
You do. Your repository, your cloud accounts, your model weights, your prompts, your evaluation sets, your infrastructure as code. There is no runtime you have to keep renting from us to keep the system working, and no component you cannot read. If you end the engagement, everything keeps running.
An AI Sprint is two to three weeks at a fixed scope and price. A Product Build is typically six to sixteen weeks, priced against milestones. Ongoing work is a monthly pod or a support retainer. We do not publish prices, because the honest number depends on scope we have not seen yet — but we tell you which pricing model applies before you sign, and we do not do change-order surprises.
We work remotely with clients across US, EU and GCC time zones, and agree the overlap hours with you at the start rather than leaving them to chance. You get a demo every sprint, a written update every week, and a reply to anything you send within 24 hours. Nothing important depends on catching someone live.
A 30-minute call. We'll tell you honestly whether we're the right team, what we'd do first, and roughly what it costs.
contact@algologix.coResponse within 24 hours